Skip to main content

Why AI in Education Isn’t the Threat You Think It Is

“We didn’t ban calculators. We taught math differently. We didn’t ban the internet. We taught research differently. So why are we trying to ban AI instead of doing the same?” We’ve been here before. I was a young teacher when the internet showed up in classrooms in the 90s. Educators panicked. Teachers worried it would make students lazy, that it would only be used for cheating, and that memorizing facts and dates would go out the window. They were right. Sort of. The internet did change things. But it didn’t destroy learning. It made us rethink what was worth teaching and how we wanted to spend instructional time. It pushed us away from memorizing trivia and toward analyzing, questioning, creating, and connecting. The same thing happened with calculators decades before. There was real fear that students would lose the ability to compute. But what actually happened was that students stopped getting stuck in multi-digit calculations and started spending more time doing real math. They m...

Committing to Change

 “True professional development begins not with learning, but with a commitment to transform learning into doing.” 

Let’s delve into the realm of learning (PL) for educators. I'm fully onboard with shaking things up a bit through what I like to term “Commitment-driven Professional Learning.” You know the outside consultant drill; some experts come in do their thing and leave without any real impact. In this model, I say that outside consultants tend to, “Blow in. Blow off. Blow out.” Not a lot changes. If we're not going to apply what we've learned to make improvements, why spend the time and money?


It's essential to reframe PL not as an exercise in learning, but as a system for effecting change. Whether it involves altering perspectives, behaviors, or teaching methods the key is to commit to that change. Then see it through.


In my professional development (PL) sessions, I champion a three-step cycle for learners: 1) Learn and Experience, 2) Implement and Practice, and 3) Return and Report. This method ensures that learning doesn't just happen in a vacuum; it's a living process that grows and evolves. 


Let me describe each step:


  1. Learn and Experience: Educators need opportunities to experience new things. Professional Learning should be relevant and engaging to the participants and should provide them new experiences to help them see the benefits of change. 
  2. Implement and Practice: Educators need time to “play around” with the change. They need to practice it with the students and modify it so that it the most meaningful for their kids. Understand, in the beginning, students may struggle with implementation of the change in the classroom. Stick to it, though. Don’t let the unfamiliarity bog you or your students down; this will disallow you to truly visualize effectiveness. 
  3. Return and Report: Grade level teams should commit to new changes and commit to discussing the progress/effectiveness of the change in weekly PLCs. Leaders need to be familiar with the commitments and hold fluid conversations with teachers during implementation. Finally, have the teachers review how the change was implemented and how it positively supports increased engagement and learning at the next Professional Learning session. 


These steps not only reinforce the new changes but also cultivate an environment where continuous improvement is the norm. That’s our goal!


Bottom line, in PL, we want teachers to learn AND do. Change is an action word and requires a commitment to do things differently. 


Learn, Do & Report

Reflect on your prior learning experiences. Did these experiences cause a change in practice? Make a commitment today to support implementation of something new at your school. Ask participants to commit to a change. Engage in follow-up discussions and have repeated conversations about the committed change. 





Popular posts from this blog

Preparing for the 2025 Math Textbook Adoption: A Pathway to Equity and Excellence

A Summary of California Mathematics Textbook Adoption Preparation Available from Equivale Alliance To Request a Copy of the 77-page Guidebook, Please Click This Link. No Cost. No Commitment. As California’s 2025 math textbook adoption approaches, districts have a crucial opportunity to shape the future of their students’ education. The decisions made now will affect how math is taught and learned for years. This guidebook by Equivale Alliance highlights why preparation must start now, outlining eight critical considerations that will ensure the selection of high-quality, equitable instructional materials. Here’s why districts should begin planning and a snapshot of the guide’s key strategies. Why Prepare Now? Textbook adoption isn’t just about picking a new set of books; it’s a significant decision that impacts every classroom and student. By preparing early, districts can align instructional materials with both state priorities and the needs of their students. The updated California M...

"How Not Trying So Hard Makes You a Better Teacher: The Backwards Law in Action" or "Understanding the Backwards Law & Applying It in the Classroom"

“True growth in teaching comes not from striving harder, but from embracing the ease of letting go and fostering natural curiosity.”   The Backwards Law?   The Backwards Law, a concept introduced by philosopher Alan Watts, suggests that the more we chase after something, the more we push it away, often achieving the opposite of what we desire. This paradoxical idea can be seen in various aspects of life and work. For instance, the harder we strive for happiness, the more elusive it becomes. This is because intense focus on a desired outcome can lead to increased anxiety and dissatisfaction, making the goal harder to achieve.   Consider happiness. When people constantly strive to be happy, they often scrutinize their lives for signs of unhappiness, becoming more aware of what they lack. For example, someone who compares their life to others on social media may feel more inadequate and less satisfied, despite their efforts to be happy.   Similarly, overworking in the p...

Evaluators on Autopilot: Is Data Crunching Drowning Out Educator Insight? Or Beyond the Numbers: Is It Time to Rethink Data-Driven Decisions in Education?

  The real power of data in education isn’t fully realized when it’s just about collecting scores and ticking off assessments. I spent a good portion of my time in my doctoral program focused on my emphasis—Assessment and Evaluation. Though often used interchangeably by educators, these terms have different, more than just nuanced, definitions and roles. I believe that since these two terms are often considered synonyms, the depth of knowledge and understanding of the term “evaluation” has basically been lost. The term “data-driven decisions” is ubiquitous in education and often a hallmark of a skilled educator. Data’s real worth, however, comes from the questions it makes us ask, not just the answers it provides. Research by RAND emphasizes this point: “having data alone does not guarantee effective decision-making” (Marsh, Pane, & Hamilton, 2006, paraphrased). This observation underscores the importance of advancing beyond mere data collection to a deeper, more strategic use ...