"Research on Small Group Effectiveness" (OR "The Power of Few: Reflecting on the Impact of Small Group Instruction""

 

"Small group instruction: where learning is personal, engagement deepens, and understanding grows."


I am working on organizing my thoughts around Small Group Instruction. But I wanted to post this summary of three research-based finding of small groups. 




Research used in Small Group post above (Disclaimer: Summaries written with AI)

1. National Institute for Literacy (2008): This comprehensive report, "Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel," highlights the effectiveness of systematic, small group instruction for improving key early literacy skills, including phonemic awareness, alphabet knowledge, and the development of early reading skills. The research suggests that small group settings allow for tailored instruction that meets the unique needs of each student, significantly boosting early literacy outcomes compared to whole-class instruction.

   Reference: National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

2. Connor, Morrison, & Slominski (2006): In their study titled "Preschool instruction and children's emergent literacy growth," the authors found that small group instruction led to significant improvements in children's letter-name and letter-sound knowledge, two critical components of early literacy. The study underscores the importance of small, focused instructional groups for early literacy development, particularly in facilitating the acquisition of foundational reading skills.

   Reference: Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Slominski, L. (2006). Preschool instruction and children's emergent literacy growth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 665-689.

3. Piasta, Connor, Fishman, & Morrison (2009): This research, presented in the paper "Teachers' knowledge of literacy, classroom practices, and student reading growth," points to the positive impact of small group instruction on student reading growth. It found that when teachers used small group settings to deliver literacy instruction, tailored to the specific literacy needs of their students, there was a notable improvement in reading skills. This approach allows for more effective monitoring and feedback on students' progress, enhancing overall literacy development.

   Reference: Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers' knowledge of literacy, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 224-248.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Embracing Change: The Shift from Professional Learning Communities to Professional Improvement Communities

Image
"Let's move beyond learning to doing, transforming our practice and supporting achievement for ALL students. Together, we craft their success." In my journey through the dynamic landscape of education, I've come to realize the essential nature of continuously evolving teacher practice to meet the ever-changing needs of our students. Reflecting on my own experiences, I've seen firsthand the pivotal role that Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have played in fostering collaborative learning among educators, encouraging the exchange of ideas, and promoting collective growth. Yet, through both my successes and challenges, I've recognized the need to transition towards a more action-oriented approach. Drawing from these experiences, I propose a shift from "learning" to "improvement" in our communities. This shift not only redefines our objectives but also amplifies [what should be] our commitment to not just acquiring knowledge but activel
Read more

Committing to Change

Image
  “True professional development begins not with learning, but with a commitment to transform learning into doing.”   Let’s delve into the realm of learning (PL) for educators. I'm fully onboard with shaking things up a bit through what I like to term “Commitment-driven Professional Learning.” You know the outside consultant drill; some experts come in do their thing and leave without any real impact. In this model, I say that outside consultants tend to, “Blow in. Blow off. Blow out.” Not a lot changes. If we're not going to apply what we've learned to make improvements, why spend the time and money? It's essential to reframe PL not as an exercise in learning, but as a system for effecting change. Whether it involves altering perspectives, behaviors, or teaching methods the key is to commit to that change. Then see it through. In my professional development (PL) sessions, I champion a three-step cycle for learners: 1) Learn and Experience, 2) Implement and Practice, a
Read more